<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiep.net Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/</link>
	<description>Link Building Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Moore</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-38625</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-38625</guid>
		<description>Very nice. I&#039;m diggin&#039; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice. I&#8217;m diggin&#8217; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiep</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37581</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37581</guid>
		<description>brewgin; thanks for the input.

The &#039;Connection Marketing&#039; is actually pretty easy to explain; link building is all about connecting websites. Everybody uses &#039;link building so-and-so&#039; as their subtitle and I like to do things slightly different.

The logo actually is a stylish linked chain, but in a way that it can also be seen as a (slightly tilted) &#039;W&#039;. Not everybody notices that right away, though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brewgin; thanks for the input.</p>
<p>The &#8216;Connection Marketing&#8217; is actually pretty easy to explain; link building is all about connecting websites. Everybody uses &#8216;link building so-and-so&#8217; as their subtitle and I like to do things slightly different.</p>
<p>The logo actually is a stylish linked chain, but in a way that it can also be seen as a (slightly tilted) &#8216;W&#8217;. Not everybody notices that right away, though :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brewgin</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37570</link>
		<dc:creator>brewgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37570</guid>
		<description>Overall good. But hey, what&#039;s a new redsign without critique?
Exactly. 

I personally liked the old one. I hadn&#039;t seen it before. This seems more cookie cutter, bland, etc. Maybe I&#039;m just a fan of big grungey headers, I don&#039;t know. 

I don&#039;t get &#039;Connection Marketing&#039;. Maybe Im just stupid, but I can imagine lots of people don&#039;t immediately think &#039;Oh right, Connection Marketing!&#039;. 
Not that the old &#039;100% sugar free&#039; added to the blog topic. 

Something with &#039;Link building&#039;... &#039;100% link building&#039;... &#039;All link building, all the time&#039;... &#039;We love links&#039;... &#039;The best links about links&#039; etc. 
To me, that&#039;s much more what the blog is about compared to &#039;Connection Marketing&#039;. Unless I miss a lot of posts and you&#039;re taking things in a new direction. 

The symbol bit in the logo... what is it? 
After a few seconds it starts looking fairly sexual. 
I realise it&#039;s not &#039;new&#039;... but a linked chain would be a bit more obvious. 

The tips in the top right are a very nice feature. 

At the end of the day: het is jouw feestje. ;-)
All that counts is that you like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall good. But hey, what&#8217;s a new redsign without critique?<br />
Exactly. </p>
<p>I personally liked the old one. I hadn&#8217;t seen it before. This seems more cookie cutter, bland, etc. Maybe I&#8217;m just a fan of big grungey headers, I don&#8217;t know. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get &#8216;Connection Marketing&#8217;. Maybe Im just stupid, but I can imagine lots of people don&#8217;t immediately think &#8216;Oh right, Connection Marketing!&#8217;.<br />
Not that the old &#8216;100% sugar free&#8217; added to the blog topic. </p>
<p>Something with &#8216;Link building&#8217;&#8230; &#8216;100% link building&#8217;&#8230; &#8216;All link building, all the time&#8217;&#8230; &#8216;We love links&#8217;&#8230; &#8216;The best links about links&#8217; etc.<br />
To me, that&#8217;s much more what the blog is about compared to &#8216;Connection Marketing&#8217;. Unless I miss a lot of posts and you&#8217;re taking things in a new direction. </p>
<p>The symbol bit in the logo&#8230; what is it?<br />
After a few seconds it starts looking fairly sexual.<br />
I realise it&#8217;s not &#8216;new&#8217;&#8230; but a linked chain would be a bit more obvious. </p>
<p>The tips in the top right are a very nice feature. </p>
<p>At the end of the day: het is jouw feestje. ;-)<br />
All that counts is that you like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiep</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37406</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37406</guid>
		<description>@Dave; would red have been better? :)

@Charles; somebody has to be the first one...

@Eduard, Edwin, Richard; Thanks :)

Oh, and yes, the emoticons are definitely on my to-do list...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave; would red have been better? :)</p>
<p>@Charles; somebody has to be the first one&#8230;</p>
<p>@Eduard, Edwin, Richard; Thanks :)</p>
<p>Oh, and yes, the emoticons are definitely on my to-do list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardbaxterseo</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37398</link>
		<dc:creator>richardbaxterseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37398</guid>
		<description>Hi Wiep - fantastic new site, great work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wiep &#8211; fantastic new site, great work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Kersten</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37385</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Kersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37385</guid>
		<description>This new design looks very good Wiep, allthough i don&#039;t see it much cause i use the feedreader to read all of your posts :) I guess i should come hang out here more..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new design looks very good Wiep, allthough i don&#8217;t see it much cause i use the feedreader to read all of your posts :) I guess i should come hang out here more..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduard Blacquière</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37064</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduard Blacquière</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37064</guid>
		<description>It indeed looks good Wiep. I think it&#039;s better than the old one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It indeed looks good Wiep. I think it&#8217;s better than the old one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37058</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37058</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one that prefered the old design? :)

Normally, I agree, avoid black backgrounds at almost all costs unless it has a serious brand implication, or it really suits the type of visitor you are hoping to attract - but it worked really nicely with the bold colors you were using.

Ah well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that prefered the old design? :)</p>
<p>Normally, I agree, avoid black backgrounds at almost all costs unless it has a serious brand implication, or it really suits the type of visitor you are hoping to attract &#8211; but it worked really nicely with the bold colors you were using.</p>
<p>Ah well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37031</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37031</guid>
		<description>The design looks much better than your old one but I don&#039;t like the colorscheme you are using here :o

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design looks much better than your old one but I don&#8217;t like the colorscheme you are using here :o</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiep</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/other/redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-37012</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/?p=227#comment-37012</guid>
		<description>@Joost, Gyutae; Thanks!

@Steven, Lodewijk; I liked the colors and design of the old header, but I agree that it was pretty big.

@YoungMaster; Thanks. The Link Value Factors page will be getting a makeover as well, but it&#039;s a static page that has to be adjusted manually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joost, Gyutae; Thanks!</p>
<p>@Steven, Lodewijk; I liked the colors and design of the old header, but I agree that it was pretty big.</p>
<p>@YoungMaster; Thanks. The Link Value Factors page will be getting a makeover as well, but it&#8217;s a static page that has to be adjusted manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
