<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The buying-links-discussion all over again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/the-buying-links-discussion-all-over-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/the-buying-links-discussion-all-over-again/</link>
	<description>Link Building Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexStivenson</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/the-buying-links-discussion-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-65561</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexStivenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/the-buying-links-discussion-all-over-again/#comment-65561</guid>
		<description>How you think, in our situation whis crisis its actual?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How you think, in our situation whis crisis its actual?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/the-buying-links-discussion-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-51970</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/the-buying-links-discussion-all-over-again/#comment-51970</guid>
		<description>Your point about the effect of commercial sites losing their organic rankings, thus being forced to pay for clicks is something I hadn&#039;t thought of before. Great point. Seems like just another way for Google to line their pockets. I understand the need to combat SE spam, but seems like their going after the little guys to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point about the effect of commercial sites losing their organic rankings, thus being forced to pay for clicks is something I hadn&#8217;t thought of before. Great point. Seems like just another way for Google to line their pockets. I understand the need to combat SE spam, but seems like their going after the little guys to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

