<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Line is Just Too Thin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/</link>
	<description>Link Building Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4334</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiep</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-11863</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/#comment-11863</guid>
		<description>Gyutae; You&#039;re right that Google&#039;s techniques to distinguish a paid link from an editorial is far from ok, but they&#039;re using it nonetheless.

Andy; Those are some great points! I guess that&#039;s just an indication of how strange and unclear this whole situation is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gyutae; You&#8217;re right that Google&#8217;s techniques to distinguish a paid link from an editorial is far from ok, but they&#8217;re using it nonetheless.</p>
<p>Andy; Those are some great points! I guess that&#8217;s just an indication of how strange and unclear this whole situation is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-11858</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/#comment-11858</guid>
		<description>I have been thinking Darren was walking a tightrope on the community reviews project for a while, because you have to pay to be included to cover Skellie&#039;s time, but it also goes towards the prizes given to the people leaving comments.
I haven&#039;t checked the value of the prizes against the amount you are paying, but at the end of the day you pay $250 and get some links.
Is there a difference between paying money for a community review, and paying money for a review from a blog author?

If it is how the money is used, I have donated money to plugin authors

Does it just come down to the payment processor - Paypal is ok, PPP is not

I Stumbled a great SEO review the other day that was paid for, and currently the site owner hasn&#039;t got a penalty.
I could easily charge as much or more for a private reivew, but prefer to make my review process public and effectively give a discount for doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking Darren was walking a tightrope on the community reviews project for a while, because you have to pay to be included to cover Skellie&#8217;s time, but it also goes towards the prizes given to the people leaving comments.<br />
I haven&#8217;t checked the value of the prizes against the amount you are paying, but at the end of the day you pay $250 and get some links.<br />
Is there a difference between paying money for a community review, and paying money for a review from a blog author?</p>
<p>If it is how the money is used, I have donated money to plugin authors</p>
<p>Does it just come down to the payment processor &#8211; Paypal is ok, PPP is not</p>
<p>I Stumbled a great SEO review the other day that was paid for, and currently the site owner hasn&#8217;t got a penalty.<br />
I could easily charge as much or more for a private reivew, but prefer to make my review process public and effectively give a discount for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demerzel</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-11835</link>
		<dc:creator>Demerzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/#comment-11835</guid>
		<description>Touche and extremely well said. People definitely tend to overestimate Google&#039;s algorithm and turn that into a fear of not doing anything whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touche and extremely well said. People definitely tend to overestimate Google&#8217;s algorithm and turn that into a fear of not doing anything whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyutae Park</title>
		<link>http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/comment-page-1/#comment-11821</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyutae Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiep.net/talk/link-building/googles-line-is-just-too-thin/#comment-11821</guid>
		<description>Hey Wiep,
I definitely think you&#039;re right in that there is a fine line between a paid link and an editorial link in many cases.  Google simply is not able to distinguish one from the other and this whole controversy is just a way for them to put their foot down and scare webmasters from manipulating their rankings via links.  It&#039;s really nothing to be afraid of unless your site comes under heavy scrutiny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Wiep,<br />
I definitely think you&#8217;re right in that there is a fine line between a paid link and an editorial link in many cases.  Google simply is not able to distinguish one from the other and this whole controversy is just a way for them to put their foot down and scare webmasters from manipulating their rankings via links.  It&#8217;s really nothing to be afraid of unless your site comes under heavy scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
